Taste, place and access · Chapter 2 of 3
Queens, and a Mood You Could Wear
On selling a memory of Queens, with clothes attached.
3 min read
Take an Aimé Leon Dore sweatshirt and consider it purely as a sweatshirt. It is good. It is not, on its own, remarkable enough to explain the price or the queue.
That is not an insult to the product. It is the entire point of the brand.
Teddy Santis built Aimé Leon Dore out of something very specific: New York in the nineties, Greek and Italian Queens, a particular kind of older man who dressed carefully without appearing to try, coffee in paper cups, basketball, a neighbourhood at a particular moment. The clothes are close to ordinary because the ordinariness is accurate. Those men were not wearing anything unusual.
What is not ordinary is the completeness of everything around them.
The café inside the store, which serves actual coffee to actual people. The casting, which uses faces that belong to that world rather than model faces. The photography, which looks like it was found rather than commissioned. The music. The shop interiors. Every single surface argues for the same precise memory, and the sweatshirt inherits a meaning it could not possibly carry alone.
This is usually called world building, and it is the most attempted and least achieved thing in modern fashion. The reason it fails so often is worth understanding.
A world holds together because every decision inside it gets checked against something real. Would that chair be in that apartment? Would that man wear that watch? Would that song be playing? When the world is one person's actual memory, those questions have answers, and the answers are consistent because reality is consistent.
When a committee assembles a world from references, there is nothing to check against. Every decision is defensible and none is necessary. You end up with a room where nothing contradicts anything and nothing means anything either, which is the definition of a moodboard.
The New Balance partnership is the clearest demonstration of what this is worth.
New Balance shoes were already good. The company had decades of technical credibility and an archive full of excellent silhouettes. What they lacked was somebody placing them inside a world people wanted to belong to. Santis did that, changing almost nothing about the shoes themselves, and turned them into the most wanted footwear in the city.
Almost nothing about the product changed and almost everything about who wanted it did. That is the strongest available evidence that in this part of the market, context is the product.
Which leads to the uncomfortable sentence nobody in fashion likes to say plainly: at these prices nobody is buying a sweatshirt considered as a sweatshirt. They are buying admission to a mood, and the garment is the ticket.
That is not cynical. People have always bought meaning and used objects to carry it. It just means that if you are building a brand and you have no world, you have a product competing on price and specification against companies with far better factories than yours.
And if you are looking for a world, the advice is narrow: look at your own life, in detail that feels too small to matter. The particular coffee cup. The neighbourhood. What your father wore. That material is the only kind that holds together, because it is the only kind you cannot get wrong.
The clothes are the easy part. The world around them is the brand.
Where you'll meet this
The New Balance partnership turned a running shoe brand's back catalogue into the most wanted footwear in the city, without changing much about the shoe except who was presenting it.